All comparisons

SteadyShares vs Seeking Alpha

Seeking Alpha is a publishing platform with data attached. We are a data product with writing attached. That difference explains almost everything.

The honest verdict

Seeking Alpha has vastly more written coverage than we do. It is also a platform where anybody can publish, and the quality varies enormously.

Where Seeking Alpha is better

Enormous volume of company-specific analysis

Thousands of contributors covering individual companies in depth. For a specific mid-cap you are researching, they will almost certainly have something and we will not.

Earnings call transcripts and news flow

Genuinely useful, and we do not offer it.

Quant ratings across a huge universe

Broad, systematic and updated constantly.

Where we are better

Every contributor has an incentive. Ours are printed

A platform where anyone can publish about a stock they own is a platform with an obvious conflict, and the disclosure is a line of small print. Our numbers come from SEC filings and our method is on the page.

Free, with no paywall on the analysis

Most of Seeking Alpha's value sits behind a subscription. Everything we publish is free.

We tell you what our data cannot do

Our research pages carry the limitations in the same size type as the findings. That is rare anywhere, and unheard of on a platform paid per click.

Pick Seeking Alpha if

If you want deep written coverage of a specific company, and transcripts, they have far more of it.

Pick SteadyShares if

If you want the raw filings analysed honestly, free, with the method shown.

See the difference in thirty seconds

Open any of our 30 screens. Every one prints the exact criteria it used, and the circumstances in which it is wrong. Free, no account.

See the screens

We have tried to describe Seeking Alpha fairly and to concede the points where it genuinely beats us. If we have got something wrong or out of date, tell us and we will correct it. Nothing here is financial advice.