SteadySharesSteadyShares
All guides
ExplainersAdvanced· 7 min read

SPACs: a listed company looking for a business

The one thing to remember

The sponsor gets a large stake for almost nothing and only if a deal completes. That makes doing a bad deal better for them than doing none.

The question

See the incentive structure, because it explains the outcomes.

Figure

How SPACs: a listed company looking for a business works, in one picture

1The structure, plainly2The sponsor's incentive is to do a deal, not a good deal3Dilution is the hidden cost4The record is poor, and it is not close

The same argument as the text, as a chain. Each step is what makes the next one possible.

Figure

Why the debt is the engine

Debt 70secured on the targetEquity 30+30%Debt 70, unchangedEquity 60, doubled

Put in 30, borrow 70, secure the loan against the company you are buying. A 30% rise in the business doubles your money. The same arithmetic works in reverse, which is why buyouts fail loudly.

  1. 1

    The structure, plainly

    A sponsor raises money into a shell that holds nothing but cash, lists it, and then has a deadline, typically two years, to merge with a real private company. Investors are buying a promise and a person.

  2. 2

    The sponsor's incentive is to do a deal, not a good deal

    Sponsors typically receive a substantial stake, often around a fifth of the shares, for a nominal sum, and only if a merger completes. If the deadline passes with no deal, they get nothing.

    So a mediocre deal is enormously better for the sponsor than no deal, while for you it may be considerably worse than getting your cash back.

    Whenever incentives and outcomes diverge this sharply, read the outcomes rather than the pitch.

  3. 3

    Dilution is the hidden cost

    Between the sponsor's stake, the warrants and the money raised to complete the deal, the shares outstanding can expand dramatically. The company you end up owning a piece of may be a much smaller piece than the headline suggested.

  4. 4

    The record is poor, and it is not close

    Post-merger performance of SPACs has, on average, been substantially worse than the market. That is an average, so exceptions exist. It should nonetheless move your prior a very long way.

Try it
The recovery curveInteractive
You lost
-50%
Gain needed just to get back
+100%
Losses and gains are not mirror images. Past about 50% the curve turns near vertical, which is the whole argument for never risking ruin.
You have got it when

You can state the sponsor's stake and what they receive if no deal happens.

Read next

The bottom line

The sponsor gets a large stake for almost nothing and only if a deal completes. That makes doing a bad deal better for them than doing none.

See the 30 live screens

Every one shows its exact method, and the circumstances in which it is wrong. Free, and no account to look.