Is GRNT undervalued? Our fair value estimate

Granite Ridge Resources, Inc. · Energy · NYQ

Our fair value estimate
USD4.16
Current share price
USD4.63
Downside to fair value
-10.2%
Roughly fairly valued. Granite Ridge Resources, Inc. trades 10% above the USD4.16 our model puts on the business. A fair value estimate is an argument, not a measurement: it is only as good as its growth assumption, and the market is frequently right about why something trades where it does.
Overall rating: 35/100, ReduceMoat score: 38/100Data quality: high confidence (88/100 of the inputs on file)

How we got here

The estimate is computed from GRNT's reported fundamentals, with a growth assumption that is deliberately capped: small changes to an uncapped growth or terminal assumption can justify any price, and a number that can justify anything means nothing. These are the inputs the model holds for GRNT today; the exact method, and where it goes wrong, is on the methodology page.

Revenue growth (YoY)+5.0%

The trailing growth rate informs the growth assumption, which the model caps deliberately: uncapped growth assumptions can justify any price.

Expected EPS growth (consensus)+58.4%

Wall Street's published earnings growth forecast, used as context for the capped growth assumption, never swallowed whole.

Profit margin-7.5%

Margins tell the model how much of each unit of revenue survives as profit, and how much room there is for that to erode.

Return on equity-5.5%

Persistent high returns on capital are what a moat looks like in the accounts, and they feed the moat score alongside the valuation.

Beta0.18

A volatility measure against the wider market. A jumpier share earns a larger discount for risk, which lowers the estimate.

Debt to equity0.78

Leverage haircuts the estimate: debt claims cash before shareholders do, and it turns bad years into dangerous ones.

Wall Street's number, next to ours

The mean analyst price target for GRNT is USD7.60 across 5 analysts, which implies +64.1% from the current price. Our estimate is USD4.16. They answer different questions: an analyst target is a 12-month price prediction averaged across banks; ours is a model's view of what the business is worth, with every assumption published. When they disagree, at least one of us is wrong.

The belief gap: what growth this price asks you to believe

Run our DCF backwards and every price becomes a growth assumption. One axis compares them: today's market price, the entry prices implied by super investors' 13F filings, the mean analyst target, and the growth our own model funds. The gap between the market's marker and the cohort's markers is the growth you are being asked to believe that informed buyers did not need.

Our model5.0%Market7.5%Aqr Capital Management*7.9%Millennium Management13.2%Two Sigma Investments13.2%Arrowstreet Capital13.2%Analysts19.7%
0% growth23% annual cash-flow growth

Today's price asks you to believe about 7.5% annual cash-flow growth. Millennium Management's Q1 2026 entry underwrote a higher 13.2%. Our model funds 5.0%. The mean analyst target implies 19.7%.

Millennium Management's Q1 2026 filing implies an average entry near $5.87, which implied about 13.2% annual growth under our model.

Arrowstreet Capital's Q1 2026 filing implies an average entry near $5.87, which implied about 13.2% annual growth under our model.

Aqr Capital Management's Q4 2025 filing implies an average entry near $4.70, which implied about 7.9% annual growth under our model (low confidence).

Two Sigma Investments's Q1 2026 filing implies an average entry near $5.87, which implied about 13.2% annual growth under our model.

Entry prices are filing-implied averages (reported position value divided by reported shares for the quarter a position was opened or materially increased), not actual cost bases; 13Fs lag by up to 45 days. How the Belief Gap is computed.

Energy peers, by our rating

The same model, run on the highest-rated names in the same sector. A gap to fair value is only comparable when the method behind it is identical, which here it is.

Common questions

Is Granite Ridge Resources, Inc. (GRNT) undervalued?

On our model, GRNT at USD4.63 trades 10% above our fair value estimate of USD4.16, so it looks roughly fairly valued today. That is one model's answer, not a recommendation: a fair value estimate is an argument about the future, and the market is frequently right about why something is cheap.

What is the fair value of GRNT?

Our current fair value estimate for Granite Ridge Resources, Inc. is USD4.16 per share. For comparison, the mean Wall Street analyst price target is USD7.60 across 5 analysts; that is their number, computed differently from ours. The estimate moves as prices and fundamentals move.

How is GRNT's fair value calculated?

From Granite Ridge Resources, Inc.'s reported fundamentals: earnings power, a deliberately capped growth assumption, and a discount for balance sheet and volatility risk. The full method, including its known weaknesses, is published on our methodology page, and the interactive Valuation Lab lets you change every assumption and watch the value move.

Disagree with an assumption? Good. The Valuation Lab on the GRNT app page puts every input of this model on a slider, including a reverse DCF that shows the growth the market is currently pricing in.

A fair value estimate is a model output computed from company filings and market data, refreshed daily; quotes are delayed. It is educational information, not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell anything. Read the full disclaimer.