Is LADR undervalued? Our fair value estimate

Ladder Capital Corp · Real Estate · NYQ

Our fair value estimate
$11.33
Current share price
$8.67
Upside to fair value
+30.8%

Price as at 1 Oct 2026, 18:27 UTC. Quotes are delayed.

Screens as clearly undervalued. Ladder Capital Corp trades 31% below the $11.33 our model puts on the business. A fair value estimate is an argument, not a measurement: it is only as good as its growth assumption, and the market is frequently right about why something trades where it does.
Overall rating: 53/100, moderate qualityMoat score: 49/100Data quality: high confidence (100/100 of the inputs on file)

How we got here

The estimate is computed from LADR's reported fundamentals, with a growth assumption that is deliberately capped: small changes to an uncapped growth or terminal assumption can justify any price, and a number that can justify anything means nothing. These are the inputs the model holds for LADR today; the exact method, and where it goes wrong, is on the methodology page.

Earnings multiple23.1x

The starting point is earnings power: what the business earns per share, and what the market currently pays for each unit of it.

Revenue growth (YoY)+1.7%

The trailing growth rate informs the growth assumption, which the model caps deliberately: uncapped growth assumptions can justify any price.

Expected EPS growth (consensus)+18.5%

Wall Street's published earnings growth forecast, used as context for the capped growth assumption, never swallowed whole.

Profit margin25.4%

Margins tell the model how much of each unit of revenue survives as profit, and how much room there is for that to erode.

Return on equity3.7%

Persistent high returns on capital are what a moat looks like in the accounts, and they feed the moat score alongside the valuation.

Beta0.99

A volatility measure against the wider market. A jumpier share earns a larger discount for risk, which lowers the estimate.

Debt to equity2.80

Leverage haircuts the estimate: debt claims cash before shareholders do, and it turns bad years into dangerous ones.

Wall Street's number, next to ours

The mean analyst price target for LADR is $12.32 across 7 analysts, which implies +42.2% from the current price. Our estimate is $11.33. They answer different questions: an analyst target is a 12-month price prediction averaged across banks; ours is a model's view of what the business is worth, with every assumption published. When they disagree, at least one of us is wrong.

The belief gap: what growth this price asks you to believe

Run a discounted cash flow backwards and every price becomes a growth assumption. One axis compares them: today's market price, the entry prices implied by super investors' 13F filings, the mean analyst target, and the growth our own model funds. The gap between the market's marker and the cohort's markers is the growth you are being asked to believe that informed buyers did not need.

Arrowstreet Capital4.1%Two Sigma Investments4.7%Renaissance Technologies4.7%Our model5.0%Millennium Management5.2%Analysts7.0%
0% growth12% annual cash-flow growth

No growth rate between 0% and 30% makes our model's fair value equal today's price, so the market is pricing something this model cannot express. Two Sigma Investments's Q4 2024 entry underwrote about 4.7%. Our model funds 5.0%. The mean analyst target implies 7.0%.

Two Sigma Investments's Q4 2024 filing implies an average entry near $11.19, which implied about 4.7% annual growth under our model.

Millennium Management's Q1 2025 filing implies an average entry near $11.41, which implied about 5.2% annual growth under our model.

Arrowstreet Capital's Q3 2025 filing implies an average entry near $10.91, which implied about 4.1% annual growth under our model.

Renaissance Technologies's Q4 2024 filing implies an average entry near $11.19, which implied about 4.7% annual growth under our model.

Entry prices are filing-implied averages (reported position value divided by reported shares for the quarter a position was opened or materially increased), not actual cost bases; 13Fs lag by up to 45 days. How the Belief Gap is computed.

Real Estate peers, by our rating

The same model, run on the highest-rated names in the same sector. A gap to fair value is only comparable when the method behind it is identical, which here it is.

Common questions

Is Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) undervalued?

On our model, LADR at $8.67 trades 31% below our fair value estimate of $11.33, so it screens as undervalued today. That is one model's answer, not a recommendation: a fair value estimate is an argument about the future, and the market is frequently right about why something is cheap.

What is the fair value of LADR?

Our current fair value estimate for Ladder Capital Corp is $11.33 per share. For comparison, the mean Wall Street analyst price target is $12.32 across 7 analysts; that is their number, computed differently from ours. The estimate moves as prices and fundamentals move.

How is LADR's fair value calculated?

From Ladder Capital Corp's reported fundamentals: earnings power, a deliberately capped growth assumption, and a discount for balance sheet and volatility risk. The full method, including its known weaknesses, is published on our methodology page, and the interactive Valuation Lab lets you change every assumption and watch the value move.

Disagree with an assumption? Good. The Valuation Lab on the LADR app page restates this estimate as a separate five-year discounted cash flow, puts its growth and discount rates on sliders, and runs it backwards to show the growth the market is currently pricing in.

A fair value estimate is a model output computed from company filings and market data, refreshed daily; quotes are delayed. It is educational information, not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy or sell anything. Read the full disclaimer.